I know what the directory does and I know too that it does not require the permission check 
But its a lot of work to add some extra code everywhere where it CAN but must not posible.
I’ll take a look for that.
But I can not say anything else.
If you want to help me with this then you can add here in this topic a list with all components which needs this check.
Thanks again for your response. Only the Player and ExoPlayer component. Everything else can be done with extensions. Most important is ExoPlayer. The only drawback with ExoPlayer is that it does not have an ExoPlayer.Completed event. But I have a solution for that.
Our default “Player” will be replaced complete by “ExoPlayer” in the future since “ExoPlayer” is much faster and better.
Means… If I add the check then only for the “ExoPlayer” component.
Super! Best regards from Germany.
Don’t forget to add your country flag
In the next major release you can use the internal path without read permission for android 4.4+.
Also I added the completed event.
Great! Also without write permission?
(I need to download files (zip-file and unzip it) first to the app-specific dir, so I need also write perm.)
Thanks, I know that I have to set minSdkVersion=19
That’s why I asked above which else components you want to can read/write without permission from internal app directory
ExoPlayer does not have write permission since it only needs read permission.
Your question if for file component, or?
I have an extension for that and do not need the File component.
Then I dont get why you ask for write permission?!
I useTaifun’s new File extension witch has also the posibility of creating an app-specific dir.
https://puravidaapps.com/file.php
Sorry! I should have only asked for the write permission, as this implicitly grants read permission.
It should works for you after we release the done changes.
If all of this is available in the next release, that would be really fantastic and would greatly simplify app creation. I will then switch from AI2 to Kodular with all my apps .
You are the best. Many thanks!
Finally, a small overview to the write permisssion and it’s declaration in the Manifest.
Regarding the (runtime) READ / WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permissions and the Player component, I’ve done intensive testing on more than 10 devices (API>22). These are my results:
As I said earlier the WRITE permission have nothing to do with Player or ExoPlayer component.
Because the players can ONLY read files.
But you are talking about the FILE component which can READ/WRITE files.
That’s why I asked you earlier which components I should edit to allow read/write without permission to app specifc directory.
Means, if you want I can look if I can do it for the file component.
Thanks, yes I know and therefore I said / wrote “WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission is sufficient as this implicitly grants READ permission”.
I know from many of my app users that they are “not amused” about permissions requests, so I want to avoid them as much as possible.
Thanks, I do not need the File component.
Hi Mika,
sorry for my confusion and the nonsense I wrote. Of course you are right.
I just wanted to ask that the ExoPlayer does not request READ permission at runtime. And I have, as I said, an extension for saving the audio files into the app-specific folder (Taifun’s File extension), which does not require the WRITE permission for an app-specific folder.
My only concern was that no READ permission would be requested for the ExoPlayer at runtime (as is currently the case with the Player Component, even if audio files are played from an app-specific folder).
Best regards,
Anke
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
