Because the whole form needs to be visible. I’m procedurally generating the form (now that I can create dynamic checkboxes and radio buttons) based on the list of questions so that it’s easier to reorder the form or change the questions.
I was just worried that the form will just pop in and wanted to fade it in. I may just make each section not visible and fade the whole thing in once the dynamic components have all been added.
No, it should work without any issues, though I’m not sure about low-end devices.
Start the next animation when the current one ends. To do so, use the when Phase .AnimationEnds event block.
I love it! Any chance you could add bounce out animations as well?
Nice to hear that. 
I’ll see what I can do.
Can i use for image sprite component? cause no one make for image sprite animation
It doesn’t work with sprites, but if you can apply the animation to all the sprites at the same time, you can make the canvas have transparent background color, and animate the canvas component and it will look like the sprites are animated.
Can you please be a bit more specific and explain what do you mean by doesn’t work on Thunkable?
BTW, do you know Thunkable is no longer maintained and is going to retire soon (or maybe, is already retired). You might consider switching to Kodular.
Time for an update!
Added five new animation types in Bounce category as requested by @ryanhapps:
BounceOutBounceOutDownBounceOutLeftBounceOutRightBounceOutUpUpdated download links in the first post:
It would be great if we would be able to give ID for every animation and be able to detect the ID after animation Cancelled, End, Paused, Resume, Start 
I was thinking about the same but, as no one asked for it and adding it would break the current event blocks, I decided not to add it. Now since, you have requested to add IDs, I’ll consider adding it if more people want it.
0 voters
Yes, I’m animating many things at once and I need to detect the animation at end time that which one is ended. So I thought the idea of ID for each animation would be great…
How about adding the component and animation technique as parameters in the animation events?
Users won’t have to worry about handling IDs if they can directly equate the components being animated
That sounds like a nice idea. I’ll wait for what others say, though. 
Also solve my problem
So, considering the poll results, I’ve added the ability to handle events with IDs, Component being animated and Technique used. But like I warned earlier, this update will break the previous blocks and you’ll need to manually replace every broken block. Blocks which are affected are:
Nice extension, glad your incorporating others’ ideas!
We should get to know each other more, maybe stop being [enemies]?
Hi Shreyash,
I need to zoonin then zoomout then zoomin then zoomout in a loop with duration & speed control of this cyclic loop. How do I do that?
Thanks,
Donald
Hi,
You can do it like this 
Perhaps, not the most efficient way, but it works.
